<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Local MP&#8217;s Reply to Same Sex Marriage Letter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brodhe.com/blog/2009/06/03/local-mps-reply-to-same-sex-marriage-letter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brodhe.com/blog/2009/06/03/local-mps-reply-to-same-sex-marriage-letter/</link>
	<description>i poked your mum on facebook</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 07:21:35 +1030</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://brodhe.com/blog/2009/06/03/local-mps-reply-to-same-sex-marriage-letter/comment-page-1/#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brodhe.com/?p=299#comment-136</guid>
		<description>Amazing.  It seems that even the one who dodged your question actually took the time to visit your site, at the risk of an opponent unearthing a 
&quot;Homo-Sexual Website&quot; in her page history.
That probably wouldn&#039;t happen here.

I just had a thought.  What if marriage WAS defined in law as between a man and a woman, but there was another term, say, &quot;association&quot; or &quot;Legal Pairing&quot;.  This would have all the same legal benefits as marriage, and in time (a generation or two) the terms would become semantically equivalent.   But it wouldn&#039;t BE marriage; this concept has been a property of god-people for a long time, and they seem to have a good thing going there.  And not that anyone could know, but I have a vague idea that heterosexual love is a slightly different experience than homosexual love.  I think the latter has more capacity for filial love, on average.  Of course, I may be wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing.  It seems that even the one who dodged your question actually took the time to visit your site, at the risk of an opponent unearthing a<br />
&#8220;Homo-Sexual Website&#8221; in her page history.<br />
That probably wouldn&#8217;t happen here.</p>
<p>I just had a thought.  What if marriage WAS defined in law as between a man and a woman, but there was another term, say, &#8220;association&#8221; or &#8220;Legal Pairing&#8221;.  This would have all the same legal benefits as marriage, and in time (a generation or two) the terms would become semantically equivalent.   But it wouldn&#8217;t BE marriage; this concept has been a property of god-people for a long time, and they seem to have a good thing going there.  And not that anyone could know, but I have a vague idea that heterosexual love is a slightly different experience than homosexual love.  I think the latter has more capacity for filial love, on average.  Of course, I may be wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://brodhe.com/blog/2009/06/03/local-mps-reply-to-same-sex-marriage-letter/comment-page-1/#comment-126</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 10:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brodhe.com/?p=299#comment-126</guid>
		<description>And that&#039;s why I don&#039;t like Politicians, lol.
They beat around the bush way too much.
They answered most of your letter, but they also added stuff that they didn&#039;t need to put in.

And Liam acted as if he couldn&#039;t be bothered.

But Squirtle, you got balls. :)
You&#039;re so confronting - well done!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And that&#8217;s why I don&#8217;t like Politicians, lol.<br />
They beat around the bush way too much.<br />
They answered most of your letter, but they also added stuff that they didn&#8217;t need to put in.</p>
<p>And Liam acted as if he couldn&#8217;t be bothered.</p>
<p>But Squirtle, you got balls. <img src='http://brodhe.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
You&#8217;re so confronting &#8211; well done!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
